As
previously reported on The Reserve Officer blog,
members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff recently announced a decision to discontinue the practice of
providing the Congress with formal lists of programs that were excluded from
the president’s budget request. However, yesterday Senators argued that they
cannot determine the military’s budgetary needs without the lists, known
formally as the Unfunded Priorities Lists. As Congress continues to hold
hearings to analyze the defense budget for FY 2013, they also need to consider
what may be omitted from the Pentagon’s initial budget proposal. Chief of among
the Senators’ objections: these lists, which have effectively been an extension
of the Pentagon’s annual spending request for more than a decade, provide insight
that may otherwise be overlooked. In a series of letters sent to the service
chiefs, Senators Joe Lieberman (I-CT), Jim Inhofe (R-OK), Susan Collins (R-ME),
and John Cornyn (R-TX) said “Without your input, we do not believe that
Congress can accurately determine the level of resources necessary to provide
for our national defense.” The lack of
information could further limit the services in their force structure, end
strength, and modernization as they attempt to meet the roughly $250 billion in
cuts.
Whether or not the Joint Chiefs comply with the request from
the Senators, the deadline for the mark- ups are drawing near. The House Armed
Services Committee members will begin issuing their drafts on the defense
spending budget on Thursday, April 26. A full mark-up of the spending package
for FY 2013 will be delivered by the House on May 9, with the Senate expected
to issue their version later that month.
No comments:
Post a Comment