Over the past week, ROA addressed government leaders as well
as military and veteran support organizations on the challenges Reservists face
when transitioning back to the home front.
On Thursday, May 17, ROA was invited to attend a roundtable
which was hosted by House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, who was joined by 15
other Democrat members of Congress. Continuing a series of talks that
have been held over the last seven years, ROA joined other associations in
discussing issues affecting veterans. CAPT Marshall Hanson, ROA’s legislative
director spoke about Guard and Reserve unemployment and healthcare, especially
during transition from deployment back to the home front.
In the discussion, Hanson focused on the challenging problem that Reservists and Guardsmen face
upon returning home: unemployment. Arguing that members of the Reserve
Components face discrimination from employers, Hanson highlighted that the
unemployment for the Reserve and Guard remains at about ten percent higher than
nonaffiliated veterans. “This is a result of stealth discrimination when
employers avoid individuals who could be recalled to active duty.” Hanson
contended “While the passage of the Vow to Hire Heroes Act was a good first
step, further incentives need to be put in place to encourage employers to hire
Reserve Component members, who while veterans, also remain on call with the
military.”
In his statement, Hanson thanked ranking member Susan Davis
(CA-D) formerly of the House Armed Services Military Personnel Subcommittee,
commending her and the committee for including transitional health care for
individual Selected Reservists who have to leave drilling status in the
National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2013. If passed, the new coverage
would provide six months of access to TRICARE Reserve Select for those who are
eligible. However, the proposed new coverage would make a small victory in the
grand scheme of seamless transitions for service members. “Unfortunately, the
transition for injured and wounded Reserve and Guard members coming off of
active duty is not going as smoothly,” Hanson said. “Many are being discharged
before finishing their military health treatment. This shifts the
medical treatment cost burden from the Department of Defense to the Veterans
Administration or TRICARE. Savings in military pay and allowances are
offset by higher health care costs and the potential disability compensation
costs from a diminished quality of life as a result of deferred medical
treatment.”
Further focusing on healthcare, especially in rural areas, ROA
attended a roundtable discussion hosted by the White House on Veteran mental
health treatment on Tuesday, May 22. Addressing the Chiefs of Staff from the
White House, the First Lady’s office, and the Domestic Policy Council, CAPT
Hanson joined other military and veteran support organizations in analyzing the
problems veterans have in accessing mental health treatment. Hanson highlighted
that only Tricare beneficiaries have access to telehealth and mental health
counseling. Through working with Health Net and the Department
of Veterans Affairs on Rural Mental Health Program, these beneficiaries can
receive the aid they need. However, as discussed in previous posts (see Healthcare:
A Catch-22 for Reservists), Tricare may not be the best solution for
Reservists and Guardsmen.
As the total force structure will rely more on an
operational Reserve force as the United States withdraws from Afghanistan, ROA
believes that more efficient policies need to be established for Reservists in
order to create an enduring Reserve force. Having to balance both military and
civilian lives, these men and women make more sacrifices; it is only fitting
that their nation gives back to them.
2 comments:
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I believe the Law of the Sea would indeed benefit the US...I also must presume that the Sec'y of Defense, Mr Pannetta, had anticipated the Treaty and may have participated in planning how we would participate in it's execution when it materializes.
The idea of international treaties usually has the US leading the way on implementing them; for example, the Int'l Treaty for Aviation has all pilots speaking English...when contacting air traffic controllers.
Wouldn't it be in order for ROA to offer some guidance to implementing the Law of the Sea?
Let us review the various Int'l Treaties, and try to generate guidance to our legislators so they can be proud of their developing an Int'l Treaty that does respect our Best Interests and still gets one of the most challenging missions completed.(This has been in the mill for more than 20 years. I once communicated with one of the authors..back in the late 70's. I attended a Unitarian Universalist UN Seminar at the United Methodist Bldg across from the UN. My email is gcmiller1936@yahoo.com) Grover Miller, LTC, USAR, Ret
WoW! Thank you very much for that enlightening article.
Post a Comment